A couple of years ago at D8, Steve Jobs said on stage something like this: computers as we know them won’t go away, but they won’t be used nearly as much. They’ll be like trucks: most people don’t drive around in them all the time, but they’ll use them for special purposes, to get particular types…
MG hits the nail on the head. Curtis writes a very detailed, insightful article, but the fact of the matter is cable is dying right now! Not tomorrow, not in a year, but now. Soon, HBO won’t be able to entice a huge base of cable subscribers to add HBO to their subscription because the huge base of cable subscribers won’t exist.
HBO needs to think about what it wants to accomplish in the near-term and long-term, and figure out a way to make their goals viable. I feel very strongly that cable companies should not be part of that equation.
Regarding the previous two HBO/Game of Thrones links, Dustin Curtis actually watched the videos (from late last year) to get some context around what HBO president Eric Kessler actually said.
As Curtis notes, the Forbes piece does seem to be linkbait-centric, but it doesn’t make the overall point incorrect. Just look at one key portion of what Kessler said:
What you don’t want to do is to pursue a distribution channel over here [ed: the internet], where you think, well, let’s go around the affiliate and we’ll get a couple hundred thousand subs. But the promotional, and packaging support we get over here [ed: the affiliate networks], which, by the way, is the foundation of our 30 million subs and enables us to get 10 million transactions, if that dissipates, and that shrinks, then we will lose a lot of subs over here.
The error in this thinking remains the notion that the cable infrastructure may not shrink. It absolutely will. It’s just a matter of when. Kessler’s comments are disturbing because he seems to view it as at least partially his job to ensure that this doesn’t happen. But it’s going to happen. It’s inevitable. He doesn’t see it.
Essentially, Kessler won’t act because he’s afraid to disrupt his own current cash cow. But by failing to act, he’s ensuring it’s going to be disrupted by someone else. Either you disrupt your own business on your own terms, or you get disrupted by someone else on their terms.
But maybe that will be a problem for HBO’s next president.
Don’t build high-speed rail from SF to LA - create an American Autobahn instead.
Here’s how it could work:
Build another three lanes of the I-5 from LA to Sacramento, completely separated from the current lanes but within the existing right-of-way. No need for tunnels or extensive bridges to…
Love this thought by Rob Coneybeer. Given that it looks like a high speed train connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco is all-but-dead (or won’t be done before I’m dead), an idea like this actually makes some sense. Which is exactly why it will never happen, sadly.
This picture of Obama is hands down the best picture of him I’ve ever seen. My statement is not up for debate. Srsly.
(Photo courtesy of AFP)
Google is really putting themselves out there with this one. This move has antitrust investigation written all over it.
Given my post last night, this will probably sound like piling on. But I’m sorry, it’s the first thing that comes to mind. I don’t see how it can’t.
How on Earth is Google going to avoid antitrust inquiries with their new Search+ features announced today? If Facebook, Twitter, etc, have any…
I was reading MG Siegler’s blog parislemon (as an aside, parislemon is one of my favorite blogs) and I happened upon his post entitled Limbs Are Replaceable, Heads Are Not. I followed the post to Michael Arrington’s blog Uncrunched, specifically the Why Heather Matters. Essentially, Heather Harde was the CEO of TechCrunch, one of AOL’s most successful businesses. It appears Heather was run out of town by Arianna Huffington, which I find interesting. Mike breaks down the behind-the-scenes politicking in his post, but it appears that Huffington felt threatened by Heather’s success at TechCrunch.
Why do people feel threatened by the success of their peers? Undoubtedly, jealousy contributes to the equation. Individuals like to be the center of attention. Arianna Huffington, apparently, wanted to be AOL’s diva and did not want to share the limelight with a technology blogging upstart. AOL gave in to Huffington when she strong-armed Heather out of AOL. I understand the motives behind this mentality, but I philosophically disagree with selfishness. If I were AOL I would reprimand Huffington for driving away some of the most innovative and driven individuals in the industry, let alone the organization.
AOL’s management needed to put Huffington in her place. Huffington is acting like the CEO of AOL, making huge decisions that impact the profitability of one of AOL’s most successful businesses.
This brings me to my main point. The best leaders distinguish themselves from the crowd by making tough, often unpopular decisions for the good of the whole. I base this claim off conventional logic (please point out flaws in my argument, as appropriate). If a decision from the top alienates (in AOL’s case, pisses off) a subordinate, but causes the business as a whole to greatly benefit, the greater good should outweigh one individual’s ego. TechCrunch should have been rewarded, but instead it was neutered. True leaders stand up to subordinates who are operating against the interests of the organization as a whole. AOL failed to protect TechCrunch, instead siding with Huffington. I find it sad that self-interest is prioritized over financial success and innovation.
Peel back the veneer of self-gain. See success as more than individual accolades. See success as the product of creative freedom and hard work.
As you’ve probably heard by now, Heather Harde — my boss for the past three years or so — has quit AOL. There’s not much more to say beyond what Mike already has. This is just really sad — sad because it never should have gone down this way.
Heather was far and away the best boss I ever…
-
Computers = Trucks
A couple of years ago at D8, Steve Jobs said on stage something like this: computers as we know them won’t go away, but they won’t...
-
Winter And The Wall

In response to my PandoDaily post about Game of Thrones earlier, Trevor Gilbert tries his hand at parody. Not all...
-
1997 Radiohead “OK Computer” Floppy Disk.
-
Build an Autobahn from SF to LA, Not High-Speed Rail
Don’t build high-speed rail from SF to LA - create an American Autobahn instead.
Here’s how it...
-
As Amir Efrati of The Wall Street Journal reports:
Google Inc. is developing a home-entertainment system that...
-
This picture of Obama is hands down the best picture of him I’ve ever seen. My statement is not up for debate. Srsly.
(Photo courtesy of AFP)
-
Antitrust+?
Given my post last night, this will probably sound like piling on. But I’m sorry, it’s the first thing that comes to mind. I don’t see...
